apophenia: Academia and Wikipedia states an opinion about using articles in Wikipedia as citations in research papers. The author makes a good point: an entry form Wikipedia is often only form one source, and has not been vetted. There fore, it’s not appropriate as a citation. He appears to be in favor of the project (Wikipedia), but cautions on its use “I don’t believe that the goal should be ‘acceptance’ so much as recognition of what Wikipedia is and what it is not. It will *never* be an encyclopedia, but it will contain extensive knowledge that is quite valuable for different purposes. If the fuss dies down, i’d be exceptionally worried because it would mean that we’ve lost the ability to discuss the quality of information.” The entry also includes several useful comments.
Today’s Special
Will you be buying something at Amazon?
You can help support this site by clicking on this link to take you to amazon.com. Thanks.Archives
Categories
- A Place to Bury Strangers
- About the Internet and the Web
- agglomeration
- Books
- Commentary
- computing and programming
- death by audio
- food
- Gardening
- Interesting Web Sites
- Music
- photographs
- Politics
- prostate cancer
- Recipes
- Searching and Researching
- security
- Teaching
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- view du jour
- web2.0
Tags
2013 ajax A Place to Bury Strangers aptbs austin average age book Books brooklyn death by audio exploding head food google Internet interview interviews java learning mystery obama obituary oliver oliver ackermann onwards to the wall pedals photos political cartoons Politics programming python recipe Recipes review reviews science security Teaching TED tools transfixiation Travel uk video view du jour worshipBlogroll
-
Post a Comment